TootFeed
@grajohnt I feel like Hannibal Lecter must have had one of these in his kitchen 🫣
@Lana Thank you for your service 🫡
@jdblair that sounds like a good idea, can you have both active on one phone at the same time?
Grrrr. 😡 Screw you, Google. This is a sideloaded app that the Play Store should just silently ignore (I sideloaded it in the first place because of some senseless region block, so I can't find it on there anyway).
I already tried:
- disabling Play Protect
- disabling the whole Play Store
- installing with "adb install -i com.android.vending $APK"Any other ideas?
Another nail in the coffin for Google Play. 😑
@amyjko Thank you, this is _brilliant_. Very much something to consider for @jovi 👍
One question though: do tokens transfer across venues? Or do I get CHI tokens, TCE tokens, etc.?
@blogdiva "nvidious" *slow clap* 👌
@jeppe He's just trying to distract from the coke traces under his nose, isn't he 😑
(sorry, no idea how I'd express this in Danish, sarcasm is hard 😅)
@reeeen Nice 👍 Aber ja nicht Katharina Reiche hören lassen, sonst überlegt sie sich ganz schnell irgendein Sabotagegesetz 🤫
@mjg59 are you reinventing UUCP?
@futzle @weirdunits Ballmer Peak, anyone? 🥴😅
@gundersen Wait until you think you're done with the project for now, then open it maybe a year later and watch everything fall apart under a barrage of Gradle and Android Studio updates 😑🫣
@foosel Wait, he's still alive?
Or... again? 😉🧟♂️
@RaphaelWimmer @stevel @jaseg @tonofcrates @jsquare I really would want some more transparency here, would y'all consider boosting my other post addressed at SIGCHI itself, for a bit more publicity? -> https://hci.social/@floe/117166670130919695
@RaphaelWimmer @stevel @jaseg @tonofcrates @jsquare oh I'm sure that OpenAI and Anthropic promise to keep any uploaded material confidential ✌️🤞
Hey @sigchi ! I've only now read about the new "Assisted Desk Rejects" for @chi 2027 (via @tonofcrates ), and I _really_ think this process needs some more transparency: would you please make public a) the "rubric" or prompt, and b) which specific LLM you're using for the process?
@stevel @jaseg @RaphaelWimmer @tonofcrates I don't think they actually trained their own LLM - they have their "rubric", which I guess is basically an extended prompt, and bolted that onto one of the current frontier models?
@jaseg @RaphaelWimmer @tonofcrates Absolutely! What I would really like to do, given the model and prompt, is to run some papers from previous years through the pipeline (maybe 3 times each) and collect some data on how they would fare ...
@RaphaelWimmer @tonofcrates Agreed - I understand the motivation, but the process is completely opaque.
From TFA: "To help ACs manage the volume, an AI-assisted tool will assess the paper against a rubric based on ACM criteria (Originality, Correctness, Novelty, Importance, and Clarity of Exposition) to produce a preliminary report for each paper."
At the very least, I would want to know which exact LLM they are using and what the prompt is, otherwise, they might just as well flip a coin. 😑
@datarama that's a difficult one. I think it mostly depends on the water depth. 🦈🐊
@inawhilecrocodile absolutely, my students had the same idea a couple of years ago: https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=sZssYagAAAAJ&cstart=20&pagesize=80&sortby=pubdate&citation_for_view=sZssYagAAAAJ:1sJd4Hv_s6UC
Sadly, this never went anywhere further, project-wise 🤷