
@tschaefer Yeah, true. π
It has been __0__ days since I had to fix a networking issue by disabling IPv6. In 2026. π
@Unixbigot oh wait, I wonder what's gonna happen if I put the negative reamer in the portable hol---
@Unixbigot nice to see that ACME finally released a follow-up product to their Portable Holes π
@glyph @mttaggart I get your point, but I prefer to purify my transformation matrices with burning sage and the blood of a black rooster. To each their own π€·π
@benbrown Burning Man simulator? π€
@datarama oh, you're right - maybe it's GPT-6.1 or GPT-6.2? Need to find the original article...
@RaphaelWimmer Addendum: I also think that some of the "AI is dangerous" conversation that's coming from the AI companies themselves is actually intended to encourage regulation - it would be a big bonus for them if you can only use AI hosted in a "licensed" datacenter.
@AuntyRed @RaphaelWimmer no, not at all - I'm just saying that there is nothing about an LLM that has agency on its own.
@RaphaelWimmer I don't think there's anything inherently unsafe about an LLM, it's still just a prompt responder. I'm pretty certain all those recent incidents about "ZOMG our AI hacked someone" have been intentionally started by a human (which is obviously also not a good look).
@gumnos in this economy, it's worth a try π€·
So... OpenAI won't release ChatGPT 6 for now because it's "too dangerous" or "unaligned". Given Sam Altman's history, I have a hard time believing that he'd voluntarily pass on any chance to increase profits, public safety be damned.
A much more plausible explanation IMHO is that it's just not noticeably better that GPT-5 in any way, diminishing returns, model collapse, etc., and that's just a really bad look if you want to IPO soon?
@scanlime π΄π
@futzle guilty as charged π«£π
@gsuberland you're right - although I still wouldn't want to try with wet hands...
@gsuberland Huh. Remember it's not the voltage that kills you, it's the current π«£
@AnarchoNinaWrites I think he should wait until shortly after the midterms. π€
@rygorous oh wait, you meant...